July 8, 2008...4:37 pm

Stop the Feeding Frenzy

Jump to Comments

I was doing what I do best (that would be working and reading blogs – simultaneously), and I happened on a blog entry by The Blogger Formerly Known as NCSteve on TPM. I think Steve’s blog post is one we should all read and consider – long and hard.

Some choice snippets from his blog entry follow, but do read the whole thing.

For those of us who followed Bob Sombersby’s (and Glenn “temporarily dead to me” Greenwald’s) critique of our political press these last several years, the pattern is depressingly familiar. Our empty-headed, corporate ass – licking, majored – in – speech – communications – learned – the – news – biz – at – a – local – teevee – station – an – wouldn’t – know – the – Columbia – Journalism – Review – if – you – smacked – me – upside – the – head – with – a – copy mainstream press only has four political stories that it knows how to write in election year summers. Just four:

  1. “The Democratic nominee is a big phony, lying, flip-flopper homo.”
  2. “The Democratic nominee is the most liberalest politician in the whole history of the these United States!”
  3. “John McCain is a straight-shootin’, straight-talkin’ maverick and if he says something, you can take it to the bank! No checking necessary. He bravely endured torture, you know.”
  4. “Oh, those silly, squabbling, disorganized, backbiting Democrats! Har har har!”

Number one, we get before the convention with a few seeds of number two planted. After the convention, the harvest of number 2 is reaped and a few stray flecks of number one waft through the fetid air. They’ve always loved ol’ Johnny Maverick, but number 3 really only broke through into national prominence back in ‘99. They’ve been running it continuously, ever since. Number 4 has been a perennial favorite of the U.S. Political press for as long as I can remember, certainly since Carter’s presidency.

Make no mistake, every campaign season will bring facts that do fit easily and accurately into frames 1, 2 and 4. Every politician with a functional cortex will change his or her mind from time to time. Of course Democrats will vote and act liberally from time to time—duh! And yeah, Democrats can be some whiny-ass self-absorbed, tunnel-visioned assholes from time to time. Some of them never saw a good that was good enough to justify letting go of their Platonic ideal of the perfect candidate.

(snip)

These facts are the chum that send the sharks into the predictable frenzy.

Of course, there is much more to this blog entry, and again, I suggest you read it, but I will end with NCSteve’s final paragraph which, I think, should behoove us all to consider:

And oh, finally, here’s a last idea, directed specifically to frame number four that others have been trying to get across in more polite fashion. Could I please trouble some of you to kindly REFRAIN FROM THROWING ANYMORE GODDAMN CHUM INTO THE WATER?? Not forever. Just four more months. Just hold it in, make a list for later use and just put a damn sock in it for four more stinking months. It would be appreciated. Thank you.

Four more months of holding it together, of not throwing chum into those political waters. Four more months to ensure that we do not have a President McCain for another four years of Republican rule and their signature style of stopping everything relating to you and me while everything goes to their corporate rulers. Four more months to stop the insanity of eviscerating the rule of law. Four more months to stop the ultra secret, no oversight, SO? lowlifes in our government from continuing to steal our treasury and our and our children’s futures.

Four. More. Months.

14 Comments

  • The media, with the Rs help, play us like fiddles, i.e. the looney left.

    Let’s not play…

  • We shouldn’t HAVE to endure it four more minutes!

    The way I see it, it’s better to tell the Democrats now what’s been pissing us off so much, or else they’ll just plan their next Congress just like the last one. If we wait until after Election Day (which should be a paid federal holiday), the party will have installed their already-compliant donkeys who will resist the suggestions we waited four months to present. I’ll gladly throw ANY incumbent Democrats out who spit on the constitution they swore to support and defend, in favor of a primary challenger who will promise to make good on that oath. But waiting until after Election Day? I think we guarantee ourselves more of the same kind of “leadership”.

    Gotta go, Keith’s show is on, and Rachel Maddow is probably subbing. She’s great!

  • Wayne, on the downstream candidates, I wholeheartedly agree with you. As have been said, we need not just more but better dems!

    But not Obama. Not now.

  • gorn by any other name

    Oh, Wayne, by all means tell the candidates as well as the current legislators what you think. Just don’t toss chum to the sharks (media and/or the enemy).

    I can’t believe the only way to convey a concern to Barack Obama is to throw him under the Straight Talk Express bus.

  • ‘zactly what I wrote the other night in the midst of a neener-neener-you-suck-you’re-picking-on-me-thread here. Not that I wrote it as well, but it’s the thought that counts.

  • TerryHusseinBinTurtle

    I’ll repeat what I said yesterday:

    You know, I’m starting to think McThird’s going to win, for the following reasons:

    1. Obama = Osama and Hussein is just …well, not right with Jesus. Watch the Swiftboating get mean, nasty, racist and very local and watch McCain only kind of denounce and deny.
    2. The SCLM loves them some Maverick.
    3. Chimpy and the Organ Grinder have figured out how to play the ‘War on Terra’ card before election day (watch out Ahmadinnerjacket).
    4. The country hasn’t finished fighting the Civil War, hasn’t finished fighting the Vietnam War and sure as hell won’t finish fighting the Iraq Occupation (ooh, sorry War not Occupation, don’t care what you say Al Malarkey or whatever you name is).

  • Needless to say, I whole heartedly agree with the sentiment of this post, but I’d like to take a moment to expand on what troubles me most about the incessant howling from a certain vocal, though I believe narrow, segment of the base…

    I continually read comments to the effect of, “When Obama earns my vote/money/support, then I’ll give it to him.” It’s surprising how many times you’ll see this comment repeated almost verbatim; surprising because the implicit allegation is that Obama has done nothing to earn that commenter’s vote. But what about his Iraq policy, his health care proposal, his refusal to take PAC or lobbyist money, his investment in a 50 state strategy, his declarations that we should engage our enemies in a dialogue, his environmental commitments, his unique commitment to technological advancements? None of that was worthy of these commenters’ votes? Doesn’t that seem a bit odd?

    Though they claim they’ll support Obama when he “earns” their support, what they really mean is they’ll support Obama only if he stands with them on this specific issue. And whatever other specific issues they choose to champion in the future.

    Ironically, it is this very attitude which could place McCain in the White House. Does anyone really doubt which candidate would be worse for civil liberties? The FISA bill was a bad bill. A lot of wrongdoing is going to go unpunished. There’s no two ways about that. But the 4th Amendment has not been stricken from the Constitution; to suggest that it has is extreme exaggeration. No police are going to arrive at your house tomorrow without a warrant and start rummaging through your things. I’m not a big believer in slippery slope arguments. Yes, this bill was bad, but we’ll have the opportunity to fight against each encroachment on our liberties as they come forward. And having a progressive in the White House and a Democratically controlled Congress will make those fights winnable. Not easy, but winnable. So let’s not shoot ourselves in the foot.

    Another fact that seems to get overlooked in this, is that this FISA bill only protects the companies in their actions that occured after 9/11, but we already know that the Bush administration started their spying program before that. So there will still be opportunities to hold these companies accountable.

    And even if you want to register your disgust with Obama’s positions, why not call or email his campaign? Hell, even withhold your money, but don’t go out and register your grievances to anybody who will listen just to make yourself feel righteous. Obama can just as easily get the message by those who feel betrayed contacting his campaign directly. This public bitching festival was not productive because there was never a chance that it would do any more to sway Obama than direct contact, but it provided the media with ample ammunition with which to bombard the candidate. It was just bad politics for an election season.

  • Thank you, BigBlue. Something to think about…

  • I couldn’t agree more Mister Big.

  • Thanks. But I feel the need to suggest positive action one can take on FISA (yes, we can still take action), and the difference between that and the moaning that has taken over the blogosphere.

    The ACLU and Firedoglake are sponsoring an advertisement to be run in major newspapers accusing Congress of failing the American people.

    http://action.firedoglake.com/page/s/fisaad

    The ACLU intends to challenge the new FISA law in court, and will run their advertisement along with the names of those who sign their petition.

    For those disappointed by FISA, this is a much more positive action to take than refusing to vote for Obama, and screaming your disappointments at the top of your lung.

    I think the key difference between the appropriate and inappropriate responses on FISA is that the appropriate action doesn’t lay the failure at the head of a single individual. It also doesn’t require that we destroy our own best chances. One can support the ACLU’s actions without denouncing Democrats, or Obama specifically.

    This also allows the story to be about the FISA legislation itself, and not about how Obama failed his supporters. The former story can prove productive, the latter story can only hurt our chances come November, at which point it won’t matter what we say or do about FISA, because President McCain sure as hell won’t do anything about it.

  • I signed.

  • You are so right, Big Blue. I signed the petition, and forwarded it.

    It’s up to the people to take this fucker back, and we will do just that.

    I’m SOOOOO disappointed in Obama’s vote — I don’t know how he could be so stupid — but hey, we all have our stupid moments.

    The fact is, it’s not all Obama. His was one vote, along with a bunch of traitor Dems and ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS.

    Let Bush sign his legacy into law. We will take it back.

  • “The fact is, it’s not all Obama. His was one vote, along with a bunch of traitor Dems and ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS.”

    This is certainly the key point. In both the House and Senate, we had a good 50% of the Democrats standing firm against the bill.

    The real reason that FISA passed in my opinion, is that, while it may have been a hot issue in the blogosphere, and while the country may have agreed with us on the merits, they were never as fired up against the bill as we were.

    I’m sure we all know that even with a Democratic president and an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress, we’re still going to have to fight for the progressive agenda. Let’s just do in the most constructive way possible.

  • mrbigblue, true words, true words.

    To protect Democracy the people will have to be constantly watching. And the more the progressive issues get promoted, the more people get behind those ideas the more of those ideas will shape your society. This is a constant battle between ideas from what we call the Left and the Right and the outcome will most probably never satisfy all of us.

    However, there is one principle that may not be compromised ever. The basis for this battle of ideas, the Constitution. Democracy itself.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.