In his op-ed piece in the Washington Post today, David Frum demonstrates a textbook case of projection. His too little too late concerns about a possible Democratic Congress’ handling of Republican screwups like the financial meltdown and resulting bailout, checks and balances, and changing the rules to game
the system are laughable, and frankly pitiful.
Frum begins with an understandable lament about how poorly the McCain campaign has been run, and the dubious nod to Palin as VP, and notes how no matter what they threw at Barack Obama, nothing stuck. But (insert sad face here), the poll numbers are so depressing, we’d have to go back to the Watergate era to find worse. But there are worse consequences than losing the presidency…
McCain’s awful campaign is having awful consequences down the ballot. I spoke a little while ago to a senior Republican House member. “There is not a safe Republican seat in the country,” he warned. “I don’t mean that we’re going to lose all of them. But we could lose any of them.”
Senators in trouble are Sununu of New Hampshire, Smith in Oregon, Coleman in Minnesota, Collins in Maine, Warner in Virginia, Chambliss in Georgia, and Dole in North Carolina. The RNC is pouring all it’s money into the presidential run (and Gov Palin’s fancy new duds), neglecting the Senatorial races, and is reducing or pulling it’s ads completely state by state. Wow, that sucks, huh?
Frum almost had me feeling sorry for the poor Republicans, but then Frum has the unmitigated gall to write this about the impending Democratic Congress:
[T]he federal government is now acquiring a huge ownership stake in the nation’s financial system. It will be immensely tempting to officeholders in Washington to use that stake for political ends — to reward friends and punish enemies. One-party government, of course, will intensify those temptations. And as the federal government succumbs, officeholders will become more and more comfortable holding that stake.
Unbelievable. After eight years of Republicans doing exactly what he fears from the Democrats, with Frum’s tacit approval and facilitation,he’s got a hell of a nerve waving the big red warning flag now.
[T]he political culture of the Democratic Party has changed over the past decade. There’s a fierce new anger among many liberal Democrats, a more militant style and an angry intolerance of dissent and criticism. This is the culture of the left-wing blogosphere and MSNBC’s evening line-up — and soon, it will be the culture of important political institutions in Washington.
Yes Mr Frum, we are angry. We’ve changed, and we will change even more. We have to fix the smelly mess the Republicans have made in this country — again — so until you and your party accept responsibility for chaos you have caused, you can take your criticisms and stick ‘em where the sun don’t shine. Don’t even get me started on “dissent,” when anyone not toeing the McCain/Republican/Right wing line is maligned as “anti-American.” I eagerly await your op-ed column regarding the “tone” of McCain and Palin rallies. By the way, it’s cute how you threw in the “past decade,” that was a clever “Clinton did it too” dodge.
Unchecked, this angry new wing of the Democratic Party will seek to stifle opposition by changing the rules of the political game.
Oh, please. Republicans can’t get anything done unless they change the rules. Look here, here, here, here, here, and here. Frum might want to learn to use the Google — or just pay attention to the poo flying around him.
Finally, Frum suggests Republicans use a statement something like this:
We’re almost certainly looking at a Democratic White House. I can work with a Democratic president to help this state. But we need balance in Washington.
The government now owns a big stake in the nation’s banking system. Trillions of dollars are now under direct government control. It’s not wise to put that money under one-party control. It’s just too tempting. You need a second set of eyes on that cash. You need oversight and accountability. Otherwise, you’re going to wake up two years from now and find out that a Democratic president, a Democratic Senate and a Democratic House have been funneling a ton of that money to their friends and allies. It’ll be a big scandal — but it will be too late. The money will be gone. Divided government is the best precaution you can have. (Emphasis added)
It appears David Frum is stricken with a terminal case of psychological projection, with heavy overtones of denial. Apparently, corruption is only possible under a Democrat-run Congress, and damn it, we need those checks and balances!
The chickens have come home to roost, and FSM willing we will have a Democrat president in January. This terrifies the Republicans and their idiotic minions because they have finally awakened to the virtual guarantee of a Democrat president with the self-appointed powers of George W. Bush.
Terrifying indeed…











Yeah, that one party rule thing gets scary when it’s the other party in charge. Up until the mid-term elections of 2006, the Republicans didn’t even know the word “bipartisan” existed, and then suddenly it was how any Democrat should be judged. That’s how we get the bizarre propaganda of Obama being criticized for a failure to “reach across the aisle”, as if the Republican Congress of the preceding years hadn’t simply ignored Democrats entirely.
I guess Americans are too stupid to remember the phrase “permanent Republican majority”.
You and I have been in the same head place this morning. Applause to you, my sentiments exactly. Great piece.
http://www.willpen.wordpress.com
This was my favorite piece of the Frum article, because it completely encapsolated the GOP since 2003 (read, the war):
Yes, Frum did it again. I hope this flavor of conservatism is forever dead, buried and gone – left only by the few who can see no farther than the tips of their noses. Good riddance.
Excellent post, willpen. Thanks for stopping by the Zoo.
Great thread, Thank you for posting…Blessings
Can anyone find anything where Frum complained about the evils of one-party rule, when the ruling party was the Republican Party?
Or is this another case of “he was for it before he was against it”?
Of course there is a concern that the Democratic Party will abuse power. It has happened before, and will likely happen again. Only now are some Republicans waking up to the somber reality of the massive amount of power consolidated in the Unitary Executive created by Bush.
Their only hope is to have a lock-step 40 vote minority in the Senate who will rule by filibuster. They’ve done it before, and they will do it again.
The real measure of the Democratic party will be how it manages its (presumed) total control of the government. Will it understand that its power is temporary and thus use it wisely? Will it use the opportunity to forge a future focused on fairness and opportunity, as did the Founding Fathers? Or will it use the opportunity to be vindictive and arrogant, pursuing extremist ideals while dismissing the opposition, as did the Republicans from 2000-2006? Will Obama and the new Congress restore separation of powers and other eroded safeguards stripped from the Constitution these last eight years, or will they take advantage of them for their own short term ends, leaving us little more than a comical and dangerous third world nation?
November 4th, if all goes well, will present the opportunity to do things right, or the opportunity to complete the destruction begun by George Bush. It’s been a long time since I’ve been willing to put this much faith in a candidate as the right person to handle such power properly, and I don’t give that faith lightly.
Let’s hope we can emerge from this with an attitude of forgiveness and healing, and lead by example so that the next Republican president and congress will behave according to the precedent that has been restored.
Outstanding post gorn, thank you for posting it..Blessings
Excellent points, gorn. You’re really quite thoughtfull when there’s no buffet around!