November 20, 2008...8:50 am

Obama’s Use of Complete Sentences Stirs Controversy

The Borowitz Report

Stunning Break with Last Eight Years

In the first two weeks since the election, President-elect Barack Obama has broken with a tradition established over the past eight years through his controversial use of complete sentences, political observers say.

Millions of Americans who watched Mr. Obama’s appearance on CBS’ “Sixty Minutes” on Sunday witnessed the president-elect’s unorthodox verbal tick, which had Mr. Obama employing grammatically correct sentences virtually every time he opened his mouth.

But Mr. Obama’s decision to use complete sentences in his public pronouncements carries with it certain risks, since after the last eight years many Americans may find his odd speaking style jarring.

According to presidential historian Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota, some Americans might find it “alienating” to have a President who speaks English as if it were his first language.

“Every time Obama opens his mouth, his subjects and verbs are in agreement,” says Mr. Logsdon.  “If he keeps it up, he is running the risk of sounding like an elitist.”

The historian said that if Mr. Obama insists on using complete sentences in his speeches, the public may find itself saying, “Okay, subject, predicate, subject predicate – we get it, stop showing off.”

The President-elect’s stubborn insistence on using complete sentences has already attracted a rebuke from one of his harshest critics, Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

“Talking with complete sentences there and also too talking in a way that ordinary Americans like Joe the Plumber and Tito the Builder can’t really do there, I think needing to do that isn’t tapping into what Americans are needing also,” she said.

(SATIRE)

18 Comments

  • OMG – that is soooo good. I think Bush got elected and re-elected because Americans didn’t know wtf he was talking about. They aren’t buying it this time with Sarah Palin.

    Did anyone else notice the bulge in Joe the Plumber’s jeans when he talked about Sarah Palin?

  • Hurray. Does this mean we can end the debate about ebonics and now replace them with Obonics?

  • What debate about ebonics? That shit is about as old as midnight basketball…

  • brainwashedsheeple

    It’s a shame… we elect the first Black President, and all people can say is “He speaks so well…”

  • Look up “satire,” dumbass.

  • brainwashedsheeple

    Oh, I get that it’s “satire”… I guess that when you read Jonathan Swift, “satire” from Boringwits OR Salon.com tends to fall a bit flat.

    And what’s with the name-calling? That kind of rhetoric does not nurture “an exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue, esp. a political or religious issue, with a view to reaching an amicable agreement or settlement.”

  • What’s with the lecturing? Should I call you “Dad?”

    I’m pretty sure you didn’t start coming here for stirring debate — like Chris.

  • What I have heard people saying is how presidential, dignified and Kennedyesque the gentleman is and how much they look forward to the nation experiencing a new time of hope and unity. I also hear people being concerned by the negative tone being put forth by those who are frighten by the potential of a new Camelot. It is sad when some are so negative that they dismiss the possibility of the power of hope.

  • Why do you come here? Seriously? Is negative attention all you can get? How sad…

  • What name calling?

  • brainwashedsheeple

    @Dahlia: I came here looking for debate, not negative attention. The negative attention found me, not vice versa.

  • It is ill advised to look for debate by acting pompous and self righteous. It tends to show a lack of respect for those you wish to debate…

  • Well braindead, this is one of your first comments, and it really doesn’t seem that you’re looking for anything like debate. If fact it seems really disrespectful and rude.

    These guys stole my idea… only it was going to be LEGO men outside of my local pool supplier.

    The placard would say “The Price of Chlorine”, and then the number would be 12,119… of course, that number is much higher because that’s only the number of drowning deaths from 2003-2005.

    I’d then place 12,119 LEGO men in a kiddie pool outside the pool supplier and chant “No blood for chlorine”.

  • brainwashedsheeple

    @Zooey: Let me address your last comment with a paraphrasing of comment I heard directed towards myself recently:

    “It’s satire, dumbass”

  • Ah, I see. I guess we would have gotten it if you’d actually been good at it.

  • What’s with the name calling?

  • brainwashedsheeple

    What name calling?

    Or should the response be: What’s with the lecturing? Should I call you “dad”? ;)

  • You can if you want to. I don’t care.


Comments are closed.