Whistleblower: FISA ‘compromise’ advances police state agenda

Raw Story

Retired AT&T engineer Mark Klein has condemned the Senate’s Wednesday cloture vote on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.

The bill, if passed by final vote planned for July 8, would revise the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to retroactively grant immunity to customers’ civil lawsuits against telecommunications companies who participated in the National Security Administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, on the condition that they can provide documentation that they were told ahead of time that their activities were legal.

Klein, in November 2007, urged Congress not to allow such immunity, having gone public with his story of a secret room in AT&T’s San Francisco switching center, which required NSA clearance to enter. All Internet traffic, he said, was being diverted to equipment in the room, as he discovered during his time maintaining optical splitters that handled data to and from AT&T customers.

“[My] thought was George Orwell’s 1984 and here I am forced to connect to the Big Brother machine,” Klein told MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann in a November 2007 interview.

Documents Klein obtained, along with conversations he had with colleagues, suggested that 15 to 20 other sites such as this were in other offices across the country, ABC News reported. The documents, acquired by Wired.com, were submitted as part of a 2006 class action lawsuit, currently awaiting further action in the 9th Circuit US Appeals Court, filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“[Wednesday]’s vote by Congress effectively gives retroactive immunity to the telecom companies and endorses an all-powerful president,” Klein said. “It’s a Congressional coup against the Constitution.”

“This cynical deal is a Democratic exercise in deceit and cowardice,” he went on. “Congress has made the FISA law a dead letter–such a law is useless if the president can break it with impunity. Thus the Democrats have surreptitiously repudiated the main reform of the post-Watergate era and adopted Nixon’s line: ‘When the president does it that means that it is not illegal.’ This is the judicial logic of a dictatorship.”

3 thoughts on “Whistleblower: FISA ‘compromise’ advances police state agenda

  1. It won’t be illegal when Obama does it. This FISA bill does not grant immunity from criminal prosecution. But no one will proceed with criminal charges. Ah, nothing like having fainting goats in Congress with Nancy and Harry being the lead goats.

  2. This issue is pissing me off more and more, as is the entire Democratic congress. WTF happened? We gave these idiots a mandate in November, and they got into office and immediately fucked us. With this FISA bullshit, the new excuse is that ‘when Obama gets into office, he’ll have his Justice Department start investigations.’ 1) WHAT IF THE ELECTIONS ARE STOLEN AGAIN? We cannot count on Obama winning, there’s a long way to go before November and we all remember 2000 and 2004. 2) Even if he does win, why the hell do we have to wait so long? I know I’m ranting, but it’s been a horrendously long 7 1/2 years, and these last 6 months are gonna kill me. I can only imagine the outrage and frustration of those people bringing the civil suits, probably wasting all their time and money trying to hold the telecoms accountable, while a bunch of suits in Washington play politics with their rights. It just sucks.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s