The Watering Hole; Friday March 29, 2013: “It Was A Dark and Stormy Night”

"It was a dark and stormy night"

“It was a dark and stormy night” . . .  over, under, and around Mount Bushmore

Sometimes the only way to reduce the risk of blowing another mental gasket via continuous immersion in the swamp of political vapidity is to back away from the dark side (which is most of it) and instead spend a few moments laughing egregiously at convenient exposures of its obtuse witlessness. And while I admit to having struggled to find just those perfect words to describe what I’m up to here today, my assignment has become clear, and it is this: toss out tidbits of levity in order to lighten the load and to minimize the fray. So here we go, bowing as we do so in the general direction of a few very silly ‘parodies’ penned by (1) a quintessential Wingnut, (2) some VERY creative minds, (3) a former President of the United States, and (4) moi.

Last weekend, thanks to a Daily Kos Abbreviated Pundit Round-up, I happened upon an opinion/editorial piece in the Denver Post entitled “Heterosexual marriage is, like, so uncool” written as a ‘guest commentary’ by a Coloradan named Sarah Huntzinger. DK’s succinct comment was followed thus by Ms Huntzinger’s opening paragraph.

Sarah Huntzinger deserves an award for her piece in the Denver Post. Maybe two awards. After all, it’s not every day you see someone combine a staggering persecution complex with writing worthy of Bulwer-Lytton.

“A perfect storm has gathered over Colorado. The prevailing winds of value-free politics, the decline of authentic debate, and the increasing global warming of relativism will collide with the upslope of secularism and the denial of religious liberties to converge with individualistic notions of freedom absent responsibility, producing powerful thunderstorms of hypocrisy, and the rain of radical liberalism.” [Bold highlights added]

Her entire essay proved to be every bit as nonsensical as did that opening paragraph, but what really caught my eye was DK’s reference to Bulwer-Lytton. That’s a reference, of course, to nineteenth century English author Edward George Bulwer-Lytton who wrote, in 1830 in the opening paragraph of his novel Paul Clifford, words which were eventually immortalized by cartoonist Charles Shulz’s character, Snoopy, who regularly quoted the book’s opening line in the Peanuts daily comic strip:

“It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents — except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness.” [Bold highlights added]

Note that Sarah Huntzinger did indeed begin her essay with a more than reasonable parody of Bulwer-Lytton’s “immortal” first line, and then followed it with a mention of “wind’, just as did Bulwer-Lytton — almost as if t’were a conscious effort on her part. She may indeed, therefore and thereby, be the perfect fit in the annual Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest (BLFC) which is, as noted in Wikipedia,

“. . . a tongue-in-cheek contest that takes place annually and is sponsored by the English Department of San Jose State University in San Jose, California. Entrants are invited ‘to compose the opening sentence to the worst of all possible novels’ – that is, deliberately bad. According to the official rules, the prize for winning the contest is ‘a pittance, or $250.'”

The “official rules” recommend that submissions be a single sentence, and note that 60 words are plenty; entries can be sent by either email or snail mail, but they must be received no later than April 15th. Now, Sarah Huntzinger actually used two sentences in her opening paragraph, but she could easily remedy that problem simply by mirroring Bulwer-Lytton’s solution, i.e. by placing a semicolon rather than a period following her opening phrase. If she’d do that and then submit by April 15th, she’d be a definite candidate for winning ‘a pittance’!

Speaking of pittances, here are a few of The 2012 Lyttoniad Contest Winners:

WINNER: As he told her that he loved her she gazed into his eyes, wondering, as she noted the infestation of eyelash mites, the tiny deodicids burrowing into his follicles to eat the greasy sebum therein, each female laying up to 25 eggs in a single follicle, causing inflammation, whether the eyes are truly the windows of the soul; and, if so, his soul needed regrouting. — Cathy Bryant, Manchester, England

Grand Panjandrum’s Special Award: As an ornithologist, George was fascinated by the fact that urine and feces mix in birds’ rectums to form a unified, homogeneous slurry that is expelled through defecation, although eying Greta’s face, and sensing the reaction of the congregation, he immediately realized he should have used a different analogy to describe their relationship in his wedding vows.David Pepper, Hermosa Beach, CA

Winner. Crime: She slinked through my door wearing a dress that looked like it had been painted on … not with good paint, like Behr or Sherwin-Williams, but with that watered-down stuff that bubbles up right away if you don’t prime the surface before you slap it on, and – just like that cheap paint – the dress needed two more coats to cover her. — Sue Fondrie, Appleton, WI

Dishonorable Mention: The blood seeped out of the body like bad peach juice from a peach that had been left on one side so long the bottom became rotten while it still looked fine on the top but had started to attract fruit flies, and this had the same effect, but with regular flies, that is not say there weren’t some fruit flies around because, after all, this was Miami. — Howard Eugene Whitright, Seal Beach, CA

Another equally grand “parody” was spoken back in February, 2005, by none other than that most articulate American President in all of American history, George W. Bush. Could the transcription of his “statement” on Social Security become a possible Bulwer-Lytton winner?

“Because the – all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers – for example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases, there’s a series of parts of the formula that are being considered and when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those – changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be–or closer delivered to what has been promised . . . does that make any sense to you? It’s kind of muddled, but look, there’s a series of things that cause the . . . like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate . . . the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those . . . if that growth is affected, it will help on the red. OK, better? I’ll keep working on it.”

On closer examination, it becomes apparent that even though what he says makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever, and even though he makes grand use of his linguistic talents in making NO sense whatsoever, and even though his words were clearly fiction designed to make NO sense whatsoever, he is, nevertheless, in direct violation of two fundamental BLFC rules: he used more than one sentence, and also more than sixty words. He clearly needs an editor, one willing to work late on any given dark and stormy night, someone who could rid the thing of any remnants of substance, leaving only the gobbledegook of incoherence (at which point the challenge definitely becomes finding the means to fall within that excruciating sixty word limit).

Speaking of blowing the sixty word limit, it was back in 2005 when, duly inspired as I was by the GWB linguistic skills, I thought I’d give the BLFC thing a try. My thesis involved a woman named Delilah who was employed by the Bush government and, because of her name, was obviously assigned to assist war efforts in the Middle East by analyzing implicit political issues.

“While acting in her official capacity as a highly placed United States
Government Middle-Eastern political analyst, it was never a secret to
Delilah that oligarchy and anarchy could be considered as substantive, albeit fractional, constituents of both monarchism and capitalism, especially when religious fervor was a part of the equation; but even though all of her professional colleagues realized she was intellectually capable of discerning that capitalistic and monarchistic tendencies remain linearly undiminished by even subtle numbers of disestablishmentarianists in a typical Mid-East Kingdom, the effect of antidisestablishmentarianists on either monarchists or capitalists, not to mention oligarchists or anarchists, remained to her a matter of the most bizarre speculation and, in fact, puzzled her so much that she found herself spending more and more nights alone at home with her faithful old dog Sampson–himself a blind and somewhat ridiculous looking long-haired Dachshund/Poodle cross–but nevertheless one who never asked for more than dinner and a kiss, a fact that Delilah found easy to appreciate given all the sexual pressures she felt at work.”

As you can see, I also blew it. Unlike George W. Bush’s multi-sentence effort, mine has only one sentence; but like George W. Bush, I, too, used way too many words. Not as many as HE did, but still, enough to disqualify me. So, I never bothered to submit it. Wasted the entire seven or eight minutes it took to write the damn thing. Still, I did something I’ve always yearned to do: use the words “disestablismentarianist” AND “antidisestablishmentarianist” in the SAME SENTENCE, and I’m willing to bet that NO President has ever done THAT before!

Next up, I’ll see if I can figure out how those two words — you know the ones I mean, disestablismentarianist and antidisestablishmentarianist — really are defined (a good trick, given that neither word formally exists, and thus is NOT listed in any dictionary, unlike their parallels disestablismentarianism and antidisestablishmetarianism, both of which DO exist, for whatever reason . . . confusing world, this one!). Maybe if I could locate (fellow Coloradan, according to the Denver Post) Sarah Huntzinger she could advise?

Ok, enough silliness. Your turn! 😆

This is today’s open thread. All Parodies–fiction and non-fiction alike–are welcome! (along with anything else, of course).

72 thoughts on “The Watering Hole; Friday March 29, 2013: “It Was A Dark and Stormy Night”

  1. I had read about Bulwer-Lytton recently while researching St. Augustine’s history:

    Bulwer-Lytton’s book, The Last Days of Pompeii, was an inspiration to Boston hardware merchant and amateur architect Franklin W. Smith to build Pompeia in Saratoga Springs, New York. Smith had played a major role in St. Augustine’s development in the 1880’s after leaving another project in Rugby, Tennessee.

    In 1864 Smith became the only civilian to have ever been court marshaled by the military. In retribution to Smith exposing illegal purchasing practices by the Navy he was arrested, tried and found guilty of supplying the wrong grade of tin. He was fined $25,000 and sentenced to 2 years in prison but was pardoned by President Lincoln just 17 days before Lincoln was assassinated.

  2. Hmmm…

    “The bottle of hand sanitizer was coated in dust, as were most things on the seldom used desk, a true sign that he had moved into a new phase in his life even though he was still as concerned about health as he ever was despite getting a clean bill of health from the family doctor.”

    That’s my first feeble attempt.

  3. Okay, I can live with this one. And it’s meta, which I like.

    “His first frustrated attempt to write a submission for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest stood in stark contrast to the glorious sunrise taking place just outside as the birds were busy about their morning feeding frenzy and the machinations of human life slowly, but noisily ground their way to a chaotic climax and demonstrating the pointless complexity of modern civilization.”

      • “His first frustrated attempt to write a submission for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest stood in stark contrast to the glorious sunrise taking place just outside as the birds were busy about their morning feeding frenzy, shitting merrily as they ate, and as the machinations of human life slowly, but noisily ground their way to a chaotic and sweaty climax.”

        59 words. 🙂

  4. Seeing her standing there like that, toilet plunger still in hand, dripping from head to toe, looking for all the world like a cat that just emerged from an unexpected trip through a cesspool, reminded him of an earlier encounter when she was younger, much younger, so much so that, to his chagrin, he nearly wound up in jail, but, staring as he was at the end of her father’s shotgun he opted for the honorable course of action, but that didn’t matter now.

    • ‘Pittance’ material!

      One suggestion (add-ons obvious):

      It was a dark and stormy night, but seeing her standing there like that, toilet plunger still in hand, dripping from head to toe, looking for all the world like a cat that just emerged from an unexpected trip through a cesspool, reminded him of an earlier encounter when she was younger, much younger, so much so that, to his chagrin, he nearly wound up in jail, but, staring as he was at the end of her father’s shotgun he opted for the honorable course of action, but that didn’t matter now other than that his recollections somehow caused the birdshot in his butt to begin to itch; again.

  5. It was a bright and sunny day and, when Jake thought about it, it was the best of eras, where nothing was blowing in the wind except for the fact that Jake really, really, liked to eat beans that were not twice baked but four times had the heat applied at the just the right temperature and time as to make them a perfect mixture for tastiness going in and producing the only wind that could be felt for a hundred miles around going out.

  6. As a child, he sat for hours in the feces and urine encrusted sandbox, unaware of the internal dance; but today, before the Supreme Court, as the conservative attorney argued against the growing menace of liberalism, his attention was suddenly distracted by what felt to him to be a colony of pinworms doing the hokey pokey around his fetid anus.

    60 words

  7. Crikey Moses, do I want to know what’s going on here today? 😯

    I never thought I’d say this: Thank goodness I have estate business to take care of today. 😆

    Laters, all.

  8. Here’s my entry:

    “They say two hands are better than one and while Gerald often pleasured himself that way, it would have concerned no one except that he worked in a morgue and the hands were usually not his own.”

    • Its not the message, its how you say it:

      “It’s not just the comforting delusion that he’s a golf-mad dilettante, but also the reverse-negative image of that delusion—that Obama is a not-so-secret Marxist Kenyan with dictatorial ambitions and a nearly limitless appetite for power. That caricature makes it far too easy for Obama to laugh off the legitimate criticisms of the kind of political leader he really is: a conventional post-1960s left-liberal with limited interest in the private sector and the gut sense that government must and should do more, whatever “more” might mean at any given moment.”

      a not-so-secret Marxist Kenyan ~ post-1960s left-liberal
      with dictatorial ambitions ~ with limited interest in the private sector
      a nearly limitless appetite for power ~ government must and should do more

      Podhoretz got this right too: “The truth is that Barack Obama and his liberal followers have been doing very serious work over the past four years, and the same cannot be said, alas, of far too many people who oppose them.”

      • What’s amazing, that even while talking about the “others” who have Obama delusion, Podhoretz is trying to convince us that he’s not like those people and then says:

        But it has done perhaps irreparable harm to the central conservative cause of the present moment—making the case that Obama’s social-democratic statism is setting the United States on a course for disaster and that his anti-exceptionalist foreign policy is setting the world on a course for nihilistic chaos.

        So he’s still going to destroy the US and the world. He’s just not a Kenyan. At least that’s my take away from Podhoretz’s serious attempt to talk about Obama Delusion Syndrome.

  9. “He liked his name Horny, his grandmother’s bequeathed dying request, upon her learning the erector set didn’t ever work, like the vaseline impregnated sock looking for its mate, forever wandering nature’s breast in search of the teat that would connect Horny to his heavenly desires, as yet unmanifested, and his dog cowered through the rigid night of his fears.” (59)

  10. On another (and totally disparate matter and having just watched President Obama ‘gather’ with and speak to people in/of Newtown, CT) . . . and having recalled as I, myself, for many years, pondered the question; WHY THE FUCK GUNS???? I have to ask: Suppose someone were to introduce, on the internet (and hopefully beyond) a petition to REPEAL the Second Amendment . . . maybe with provisos attached that would allow reasonable (maybe even excessive) “compensation”, in dollars, as part of the process to, in effect, confiscate in order to finally do away with each and every gun (regardless: period, end of story, ALL of them) to be melted down and recycled as steel, in whichever format, that might instead improve society rather than allow the means to kill children, and others . . . .

    Would anyone, here, besides me, sign it with the hope that maybe one day, something official might result?

    I would sign it in a heartbeat — in case clarification of intent might ever be an issue.

  11. The question that I find myself wondering about, now that Fat Boy has popped a Viagra and has put all his toys on standby to launch

    Is how far down the chain of command do you have to go, before you meet the ‘Kim Jong-un is an infallible Stalinist God’ full-on crazies …. I mean Kim Jong-Un must know he’s a dictatorial bastardo, who can only rule by being a violent, vicious sociopath with a lot of armed followers keeping the rest in line. But the next line is his generals, they must know that he’s just a fat nut job more in line with a crime boss than a country leader…. then the next rank down… what do they think.

    Obviosuly the poor sods in the enlisted ranks are totally brainwashed… but where does the crazy stop and the sociopathic crooks take over?

  12. Jim Carrey responds to Fox News over their faux outrage at his recent video

    Since I released my “Cold Dead Hand” video on Funny or Die this week, I have watched Fux News rant, rave, bare its fangs and viciously slander me because of my stand against large magazines and assault rifles. I would take them to task legally if I felt they were worth my time or that anyone with a brain in their head could actually fall for such irresponsible buffoonery. That would gain them far too much attention which is all they really care about.

    I’ll just say this: in my opinion Fux News is a last resort for kinda-sorta-almost-journalists whose options have been severely limited by their extreme and intolerant views; a media colostomy bag that has begun to burst at the seams and should be emptied before it becomes a public health issue.

    I sincerely believe that in time, good people will lose patience with the petty and poisonous behavior of these bullies and Fux News will be remembered as nothing more than a giant culture fart that no amount of Garlique could cure.

    I wish them all the luck that accompanies such malevolence.

  13. Life as a microbe wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, destined as he was to spend his entire existence in the small intestine of someone whose culinary tastes were limited to fast food and cheap beer, but then, by the time anything resembling food passed his way, who could really tell; suffice to say, when he asked to be reincarnated it never occurred to him he would be covered in shit for a lifetime.

    • O’R and insHannity are waging the war on Easter so most certainly they’d see this act of the Pope as not quite Christian.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s