Pro-Life, at any cost.

The American Life League, Inc.’s website reveals their take on abortion statistics:

Total number of abortions in the U.S. 1973-2011: 54.5 million+

234 abortions per 1,000 live births (according to the Centers for Disease Control)
Abortions per year: 1.2 million
Abortions per day: 3,288
Abortions per hour: 137
9 abortions every 4 minutes
1 abortion every 26 seconds

These statistics include only surgical and medical abortions. Because many contraceptive measures are abortifacients (drugs that induce or cause abortions), it is important not to overlook the number of children killed by chemical abortions. Since 1965, an average of 11 million women have used abortifacient methods of birth control in the United States at any given time. Using formulas based on the way the birth control pill works, pharmacy experts project that about 14 million chemical abortions occur in the United States each year, providing a projected total of well in excess of 610 million chemical abortions between 1965 and 2009.

So, this is what the “Pro-Life” crowd wants to prevent, in blocking access to surgical and “chemical” abortions – the addition of over 600 million to the population of the United States in one generation.

The current population of the United States is about 300 million. According to the American Life League, had women been prevented from having abortions, the population would have been amore than 900 million.

Reality Check Time.

More live births do not equal a more equitable distribution of wealth. For 98% of us, three people would have to survive on the resourses/income that one person has now. Put differently, triple the size of your household, without any raise in income. Now provide for your family.

And while you’re pondering that, imagine triple the demand for food, shelter, energy, etc. Nothing like tripling demand to drive up prices. But, with more workers in the workforce, wages are driven lower.

Ending birth control and abortions will cause a population explosion that will create a humanitarian crisis of biblical proportions. The ensuing population growth will be unsustainable, the suffering from abject poverty and starvation unfathomable.

But the “Pro-Life” crowd is incapable of comprehending the logical consequences of their own actions.

4 thoughts on “Pro-Life, at any cost.

  1. So this ‘American Life League’ considers the use of ‘The Pill’, to be a chemical abortion?

    How many ‘chemical abortions’ does one woman on the pill account for in a year? One per day, each day she takes the pill, or one per monthly cycle?

    Had she not taken the pill, once a woman was pregnant she wouldn’t continue to rack up more ‘chemical abortions’, so the 600 million figure added to the population also wouldn’t hold true, if the option to use birth control didn’t exist.

    Then there’s the likelihood that women, without access to birth control, would be less willing to expose themselves to pregnancy, and either ‘say no’, or engage in alternative sexual activities. Once again, the figure 600 million wouldn’t hold true.

    • I also doubt the 600 million figure over 40 years accounts for population growth based on babies having babies after 20 years + or -.

  2. As I review observations made during my near 71 years here, and as I ponder the essentially unbelievable consequence to the planet of human overpopulation, I invariably conclude that abortion/pregnancy termination is most often a blessing, not a curse . . . an “any port in a storm” type of solution to the most massive earthly catastrophe in at least 65 million years, i.e. the presence of far more humans than there ever oughtta be.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s