Sunday Roast: The Hubris of the Huckabee

We knew it was coming, right?  Huckabee sticks up for those poor, poor Duggars.

Janet and I want to affirm our support for the Duggar family. Josh’s actions when he was an underage teen are as he described them himself, ‘inexcusable,’ but that doesn’t mean ‘unforgivable.’ He and his family dealt with it and were honest and open about it with the victims and the authorities. No purpose whatsoever is served by those who are now trying to discredit Josh or his family by sensationalizing the story. Good people make mistakes and do regrettable and even disgusting things. The reason that the law protects disclosure of many actions on the part of a minor is that the society has traditionally understood something that today’s blood-thirsty media does not understand—that being a minor means that one’s judgement is not mature.

Unless you’re Black or Hispanic…or from a broken home or unwed mother…or have gay parents, OF COURSE.  BTW, “mistakes” happen once or twice, not over and over again, leaving child victims in one’s wake.  A fourteen year old isn’t fully mature, but he should have a basic understanding of what’s right and what’s wrong — especially since the Duggar claim to be on higher ground than the rest of us in that area.

Those who have enjoyed revealing this long ago sins in order to discredit the Duggar family have actually revealed their own insensitive bloodthirst, for there was no consideration of the fact that the victims wanted this to be left in the past and ultimately a judge had the information on file destroyed—not to protect Josh, but the innocent victims.

Hmmmm, I would argue that revealing that Josh Duggar was (is?) a child molester was not to discredit the Duggar family, but to protect any little girls in his vicinity from being sexually abused.  Frankly, the “fact” that the victims wanted their sexual abuse at the hands of their own brother “left in the past” is suspect, since the parents who failed to protect the girls in the first place were the ones influencing such a decision-making process — AND they allowed the molester to return to the home.

Huck wraps it up with a brand new shovel:

It is precisely because we are all sinners that we need His grace and His forgiveness. We have been blessed to receive God’s love and we would do no less than to extend our love and support for our friends. In fact, it is such times as this, when real friends show up and stand up. Today, Janet and I want to show up and stand up for our friends. Let others run from them. We will run to them with our support.

Awwwww, Huck didn’t really want to be presidunce anyway, but don’t worry — he’ll keep up his folksy snake oil sales/sham campaign as long as he possibly can.

Huckabee’s self-satisfied assholierthanthou attitude has caught up to him, and his minions are not amused.

Oopsy.  Huck forgot to consider that some of his followers had been in the Duggar girls’ position.  Of course, he’s pretty consistent in forgetting unpleasantness.

Brava, Carisa!!  Critical thinking!  Keep up the good work.  Huck’s going to miss your subscription to “Learn Our History” most of all…

Montel Williams chimed in with this tweet:

And continued on facebook, with a nasty dose of Tony Perkins, as seen on RawStory.

In short, Mike Huckabee thinks he’s a brilliant, intelligent, compassionate Christian, who’s promoting excellent family values and sticking by his friends in hard times, but he’s actually a slimy bigoted skeev, who thinks anyone who DOESN’T believe what he believes is “less than,” and anyone who DOES believe what he believes can molest little girls (including his own sisters) and it’s just a “mistake” awaiting forgiveness from “god,” and we big meanies just need to get over.  He doesn’t give a shit about the harm done to John Duggar’s sisters, and I highly doubt he cares about the Duggar family at all, except for the weird political boost and associated publicity attached to them, and he’s stupid enough to believe we don’t know it (I’m pretty sure the Duggars are completely clueless when it comes to Huck — and everything else, except money).  Even worse, Huck KNOWS most of his followers are stupid enough not to know it, but is too filled with hubris to see past the end of his self-centered, hateful, bigoted agenda.

Buh bye, Mike.  I’d ask that you return to the underside of the rock from which you crawled, but I know the money’s just too good for a “good” “Christian” “man” like you to resist.

This is our very late daily open thread — I’m cranky.

18 thoughts on “Sunday Roast: The Hubris of the Huckabee

  1. Here’s the thing. The Duggars are Arkies and the pHuckabees are Arkies. What that can often mean is that there ain’t many forks in their family trees, so a young dude that likes to diddle his sisters ain’t all that uncommon, y’ see. Wouldn’t surprise me if Sen. Cotton might also come out like pHuckabee has. Same reason. 😈

    • If you are one of God’s Chosen you are forgiven, no matter how horrible the crime. If you’re not one of God’s Chosen you are damned, no matter how much good you do.


      you know…

  2. Like several people commented on one of the two Raw Story threads about Huckabee, I’d say that at this point, the only reason why Fuckabee may try to keep up the illusion/delusion of his candidacy is for the $$$.

    It would be nice if this shit would stick to him enough for the rest of his followers to see him for the slimy snake-oil huckster that he is. Maybe a few eyes would be opened about the many money-grubbing evil-gelicals and megachurches, too.

    I can dream, can’t I?

    • ya know, I sorta wish Christ would come back…’cuz a lot of ‘christians’ would find themselves in the lake of fire and would be surprised as shit about it!

    • Interesting. By that logic, if I am fired by, say, Exxon-Mobil (for whom I obviously don’t “work’), does that mean that everyone is safe because I can no longer become CEO even if logic tells me that I really ought to in order to bring some sensibility to the company? Can Obama be impeached by Chicago so as to make sure he can never be mayor?

      Interesting that the Constitution says nothing about impeaching the unemployed or unelected. I wonder why that is?

      Anyway, I can think of 18 or so Republicans that need to be impeached before Nov. 2016 — assuming a whole lot of unclear stuff, of course.

  3. I have a confirmed sighting of two baby bunnies in my back yard! I am wondering if it’s the same line of bunnies I have had for a number of years.

      • I’m in the middle of a neighborhood, blocks away from the edge of the mountain. I have had a rabbit in my yard for years. I started seeing the most recent one in March when I’d get home from work. Once in a while, I’d see her at dusk when I was home. I think they’re holed up in my shed.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s