Gov. Sanford: By Accepting Education Funds = ‘Fiscal Child Abuse’

South Carolina lawmakers Thursday attempted to turn up the pressure on Gov. Mark Sanford to accept $700 million in federal stimulus money intended to balance state budgets by funding schools and public safety.

Without the money, lawmakers said, the impact on the state budget would be chaos.

But U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said the U.S. Department of Education may send the money to S.C. schools – even if the governor or lawmakers do not request it and argued state lawmakers should include the money in their budget.

Without half of the $700 million next year, Leatherman said, schools will lay off teachers, prisons will close and many state agencies could have their budgets virtually eliminated. State colleges, others said, could require double-digit tuition increases.

Legal scholars are divided about the constitutional questions surrounding the federal stimulus bill, and whether the Legislature can request the money if Sanford refuses to accept it by midnight April 3.

1 thought on “Gov. Sanford: By Accepting Education Funds = ‘Fiscal Child Abuse’

  1. Really? What the fuck does that mean?

    Is it the child being abused with money, or is the money abusing the child?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s